← Search

Kelly Young

— year-end
75 matches · 68W–7L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kelly Young to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Howell · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elise Mcmasters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morris Kelly Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Scarborough · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morris Kelly Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Michael Duncan / Kelly Gregory
2026-07-18 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Lindsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Scarborough · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Waldrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Waldrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · Kelly Young 4.0 18s · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaime Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-07 · Hester Lowe · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hester Lowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-29 · Amanda Howell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-25 · Amanda Howell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-21 · Amanda Howell · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaime Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams39 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.8% of games
3.0
100%
19W–0L · 78.5% of games
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 72% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.8% of games
6.5
100%
9W–0L · 77% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.5% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.8% of games
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#1 Singles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches
#3 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams