← Search

Seth Brohinsky

— year-end
32 matches · 16W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Seth Brohinsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Joshua Wilde championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · WOB:Woburn:Guth/Tzannes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nick Quinones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · WOB:Woburn:Guth/Tzannes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Wilde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · WOB:Woburn:Guth/Tzannes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ronald Graziosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · WOB:Woburn:Guth/Tzannes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Wilde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-08-11 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Sillman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-07-25 · BRTC:Bass River:Lebatique/LaPierre · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with George Markell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-07-02 · WOB:Woburn:Tzannes/Reyes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Guth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-06-18 · WOB:Woburn:Tzannes/Reyes · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-04 · WOB:Woburn:Tzannes/Reyes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Sillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-05-28 · WOB:Woburn:Tzannes/Reyes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samuel Charney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-05-23 · BRTC:Bass River:Lebatique/LaPierre · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Moses Grader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 55% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams