← Search

Brian Acker

Winston Salem, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 22W–24L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brian Acker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Fuerst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-08 · Yadkin/Clay/40+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Ankerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-03 · Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adam Elledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Yadkin/Clay/40+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Ankerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-27 · Yadkin/Clay/18+ 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · Yadkin/Clay/18+ 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · Yadkin/Clay/18+ 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-27 · Yadkin/Moxley/18+4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · Yadkin/Burkhalter/40+3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-20 · Yadkin/Moxley/18+4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · Yadkin/Burkhalter/40+3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-13 · Yadkin/Moxley/18+4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.1% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams