← Search

Adam Elledge

Mocksville, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 7W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Adam Elledge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Yadkin/Clay/40+6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacobo Araujo Nieto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Yadkin/Clay/18+6.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Richard Moye / William Burns
2026-04-06 · Yadkin/Garza/18+3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Travis Gable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · Yadkin/Garza/18+3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Travers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · Yadkin/Garza/18+3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Travers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-02 · Yadkin/Garza/18+3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tyler Elseth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-11 · Yadkin/Paukner/18+6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Arin Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-09 · Yadkin/Paukner/18+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brad Stilwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-05 · Yadkin/Paukner/18+6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Arin Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-28 · Yadkin/Paukner/18+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Justin Hammonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-22 · Yadkin/Ayers/18 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Virginia Pleasants mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.2% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.6% of games
3.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 27.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#3 Mixed Doubles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer