← Search

Kimberly Siegel

— year-end
18 matches · 8W–10L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Kimberly Siegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2022-06-16 · CP NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Alijani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2022-06-09 · CP NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Alijani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-06-02 · CP NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Alijani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-05-12 · CP NAVY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Alijani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2021-06-17 · CP RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Alijani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2021-06-14 · CHCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcy White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2021-06-07 · CHCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Dimarco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2021-05-27 · CP RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Alijani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2021-05-25 · CHCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Dimarco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-05-20 · CP RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Alijani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-05-18 · CHCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Dimarco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2021-05-11 · CHCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Dimarco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams4 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert