← Search

Andrea Gordon

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 53W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Gordon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
L
2026-07-30 · CACM BLACK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monique Wehrle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monique Wehrle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · CACM BLACK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monique Wehrle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-30 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzi Janzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · SS-H BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Hallowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-27 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-19 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Barghelame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-08-12 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Barghelame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-07 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-05 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
44.4%
48W–60L · 49.4% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#1 Singles
9%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova