← Search

Yvette Watson

CASTLE PINES, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 95W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Yvette Watson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
W
2026-08-29 · RRTC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Abrams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Mayme McDonald championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Julie Schoenfeld / Pauline Lahey
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Shawn Blackwood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Mayme McDonald championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-08-06 · RRTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mayme McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Mayme McDonald championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-07-30 · RRTC GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · RRTC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Varner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · CPV BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-02 · RRTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Inge Bentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · CPV BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britney Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · CPV BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mayme McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.6% of games
3.5
80.8%
21W–5L · 59.8% of games
4.0
56.1%
46W–36L · 53.3% of games
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 60.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 55.1% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer