← Search

Nicole Rahm

— year-end
186 matches · 113W–73L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nicole Rahm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history186 matches
W
2026-08-27 · He.Williams18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Helen Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-27 · PW.Fekete · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-08 · Lu.Lewis40A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · PW.Fekete · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-31 · PW.Fekete · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-27 · Lu.Lewis40A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aline Laborde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-25 · PW.O'Connor · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · PW.Fekete · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Cheryl Mitchell / Christine Watson
2026-03-20 · Lu.Lewis40A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-18 · PW.O'Connor · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sherene Halko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80.4%
37W–9L · 60.9% of games
4.5
51.6%
32W–30L · 49% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.1% of games
8.5
65.3%
32W–17L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams