← Search

Neeta Vora

Chapel Hill, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
206 matches · 131W–75L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Neeta Vora to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history206 matches
W
2026-09-07 · AHoots.40C-UNC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Benkowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-24 · AHoots.40C-UNC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cristina Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-06 · TOC.Armstrong · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-03 · AHoots.40C-UNC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · El.Speicher18T · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-25 · El.Speicher18T · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke DeMarco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-24 · El.Speicher18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Felita Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · LBible-UNC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke DeMarco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · JRoss-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Tomkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · El.Speicher18T · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nora Lenahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · TOC.Rider · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · LBible-UNC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke DeMarco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 70.2% of games
4.5
65.5%
74W–39L · 56.8% of games
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 64% of games
8.5
55.8%
24W–19L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
31 matches
#1 Singles
6%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova