← Search

Carolyn M Johnson

New Albany, OH
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
133 matches · 41W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carolyn M Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-04-24 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-4
L
2026-04-17 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-10 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-06 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Bernard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-27 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-22 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-20 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-06 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
W
2026-01-23 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-09 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
34.5%
38W–72L · 44.1% of games
4.0
10%
2W–18L · 30.3% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#2 Singles
17%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams