← Search

Eileen Pewitt

New Albany, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 66W–154L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eileen Pewitt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
L
2026-05-08 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Kulesa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-04-24 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn M Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-4
L
2026-04-17 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn M Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Kulesa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-16 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Parsons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-15 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Kulesa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn M Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-23 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Midge Taylor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-22 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn M Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-06 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn M Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn M Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
W
2026-01-23 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn M Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 39.5% of games
4.0
34.7%
43W–81L · 44.9% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.7% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
19.4%
13W–54L · 38.6% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
52 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert