← Search

John Daley

— year-end
221 matches · 117W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Daley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history221 matches
W
2026-08-16 · KTC-Chamberlain · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with NATALIE PHILLIPS mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · KTC-Daley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · KTC-Pickrel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Stankas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-12 · KTC-Chamberlain · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Gramza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · KTC-Daley · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kunal Desai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · KTC-Pickrel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · KTC-Chamberlain · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Gramza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Rodolfo Aguilera / Joseph Graham
2026-06-27 · KTC-Daley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Kyle Webb / William Bennington
2026-06-27 · KTC-Pickrel · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
William Baldwin / Bryan Ulery
2026-06-20 · KTC-Pickrel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · KTC-Daley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tristan Handler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Mike Ritze / William Baldwin
2026-06-13 · KTC-Pickrel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Pickrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
72.7%
48W–18L · 61% of games
4.0
27.4%
20W–53L · 39.3% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 53.6% of games
7.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.9% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 64% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54%
27W–23L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert