← Search

Lee Berrios-Smothers

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 78W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lee Berrios-Smothers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
L
2026-08-27 · ABaxley.55.6.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yuko Resseguie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-24 · Ap.Lyon18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with April Bazin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · Ka.Nani40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-17 · ABaxley.55.6.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Misa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · Ka.Nani40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jodi Haire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · Da.Rea40M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Smothers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-22 · Ca.Zimmerman55M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Smothers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-15 · Ca.Zimmerman55M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Smothers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · Bi.Green55M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Blevins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-07-09 · Ha.Broglin18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · Ha.Broglin18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbra Wait
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · Da.Rea40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Rauth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
52.5%
21W–19L · 54.8% of games
3.5
25.9%
14W–40L · 41.8% of games
6.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 49.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.6% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe