← Search

John van Campen

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
317 matches · 144W–173L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John van Campen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history317 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Jo.Parham55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terry Holder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · An.Womack40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Owen Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-25 · Jo.Parham55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gordon Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-24 · An.Womack40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Owen Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Ma.Roschel40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeffrey Rini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · Jo.VanCampen18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Sage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Hauge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Jo.VanCampen40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Troch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · Jo.VanCampen40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Troch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Jo.VanCampen18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Rawls mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-15 · Te.McKee55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Briggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Je.Troch55M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa K Austin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
32W–16L · 56.9% of games
4.0
29.9%
23W–54L · 41.3% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 52% of games
7.5
52.8%
38W–34L · 51.7% of games
8.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 33.1% of games
3.5mixed
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.2% of games
4.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
29.2%
7W–17L · 44.5% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
102 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
97 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal