← Search

Anne Redmond

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 85W–86L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Anne Redmond to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Ki.Manning55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mitzi Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · An.Redmond40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Fultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Ki.Manning55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-30 · An.Redmond40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · Jo.Nance55M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Ball mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-20 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Kivisto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-25 · Jo.Nance40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Reardon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheri Kivisto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Tr.Crabtree40T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ana Maria Allessi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · Jo.Nance40M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bobby Hammond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-10 · Jo.Nance55M3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ayden Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.9% of games
3.0
49.3%
33W–34L · 50% of games
3.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 30.1% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.6% of games
6.5
29.2%
7W–17L · 43% of games
3.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.9% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova