← Search

Sheila Newton

— year-end
59 matches · 20W–39L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sheila Newton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-09-02 · DRoach-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Valerie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · DRoach-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christy Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-21 · LFarber-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Araya Coffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-04-07 · LFarber-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Araya Coffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-28 · LFarber-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frances Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Diane Koenigshofer / Valerie Williams
2026-03-27 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-20 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · VHiguchi-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-05 · CStevens-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Kleeberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-22 · CStevens-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-09-18 · LFarber-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara ODonnel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-09-08 · CStevens-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
38.7%
12W–19L · 46.1% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 32.2% of games
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 52% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova