← Search

Kate Harshbarger

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 72W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kate Harshbarger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
L
2026-09-14 · LHeymann-UNC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Heymann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-21 · CMills-UNC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · LHeymann-UNC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Heymann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-31 · CMills-UNC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Heymann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · LKieffer-UNC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · CMills-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with LAURIE KIEFFER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-04-23 · LKieffer-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · LKieffer-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with LAURIE KIEFFER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · CMills-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Muzyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Katie Sanders / Yolanda Deaver
2026-04-09 · LKieffer-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with LAURIE KIEFFER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-30 · CMills-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebekah Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-26 · LKieffer-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with LAURIE KIEFFER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.8% of games
3.0
62.9%
22W–13L · 56.4% of games
3.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 49.8% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.8% of games
6.5
78.1%
25W–7L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams