← Search

Diane Koenigshofer

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 38W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Diane Koenigshofer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-11 · JRosen.18C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Rosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-10 · JStockwell.C.-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carla Sevilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carey Baddour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-04 · JRosen.18C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-03 · JStockwell.C.-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monica Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-6
W
2026-08-28 · SShelby.55C-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-27 · JStockwell.C.-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Lange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Jennifer Taylor / Linda Blevins
2026-08-21 · JRosen.18C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Sapeta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · JStockwell.C.-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Stacey Smith / Sarah Bronico
2026-08-07 · JRosen.18C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Sapeta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · JRosen.18C-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Sapeta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
Kristi Laan / Amy Gillespie
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · with Mignon Lunsford championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
21W–14L · 52.2% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 24.4% of games
6.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 48.4% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer