← Search

Wendy Sielaty

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
353 matches · 168W–185L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Wendy Sielaty to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history353 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Je.Wolborsky40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ngoc Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-09-01 · TOC.Hollett · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Regina Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · ACP.Lowrance · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marie Gelston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-24 · Pa.Alford18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Parrnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · Je.Wolborsky40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ngoc Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-18 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Parrnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-13 · We.Sielaty55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Parrnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · TOC.Allen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Audrey Hollett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jennifer Johnson / Kristin Baldyga
2026-07-31 · TOC.Allen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Audrey Hollett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-30 · We.Sielaty55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Parrnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · TOC.Allen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · TOC.Allen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Audrey Hollett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.2% of games
3.0
52.2%
95W–87L · 49.6% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.6% of games
5.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.5% of games
5.5
55.6%
20W–16L · 50% of games
6.5
25.6%
11W–32L · 41.2% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 38.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
133 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
112 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
65 matches
#3 Singles
7%
24 matches
#2 Singles
4%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal