← Search

Julie Tapp

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
252 matches · 118W–134L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Julie Tapp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
W
2026-08-31 · TOC.Cuccaro · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-30 · TOC.Cuccaro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kay Kajiwara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-05 · KF.Tapp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephane Daniel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · TOC.Cuccaro · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kay Kajiwara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Lou Hensley / Jennifer Hensley
2026-07-19 · KF.Tapp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Pare mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
Christine Watson / Cheryl Mitchell
2026-07-15 · KF.Lee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Strother
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · KF.Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Godfrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · KF.Tapp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephane Daniel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-11 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Carley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
Vanese Clough / Elizabeth Marriott
2026-04-25 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Carley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · KF.Haire · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wilda Eade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · KF.Haire · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Schoots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.5% of games
3.5
56.9%
29W–22L · 52.2% of games
4.0
25.7%
18W–52L · 40.4% of games
7.5
46.2%
37W–43L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
72%
18W–7L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
53 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova