← Search

Frederick Holding

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 120W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Frederick Holding to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
L
2026-08-15 · TOC.Byrd · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benjamin Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bharath Dheekonda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · ABaxley.40.3.5-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Baxley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Michael Young / Tanner Dellinger
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Devohn Vines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · ABaxley.40.3.5-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tenesha Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Dominic Ferraro / Quinn Dawson - (DQ)
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Deraymes Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Deraymes Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Matt Craver / Logan Caldwell
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Deraymes Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Deraymes Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bharath Dheekonda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with Matthew Curry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
65.6%
42W–22L · 58.6% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.1% of games
7.5
51.6%
16W–15L · 52.7% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
80.6%
25W–6L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
43 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer