← Search

Conor Kregecz

Apex, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 69W–28L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Conor Kregecz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-08-26 · JMontague.6.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matthew Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · JMontague.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Noga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · JMontague.6.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nishant Mohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-09 · JMontague.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Schumann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
David Hedeman / Lizzy Burch
2026-07-21 · KLaan-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Straube mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JAMES MONTAGUE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · KLaan-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Chan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · JMontague-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JAMES MONTAGUE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · KLaan-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gillespie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · KLaan-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gillespie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-03 · JMontague-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
72.3%
34W–13L · 60.1% of games
4.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 66.2% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.4% of games
7.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 46.2% of games
3.5mixed
88.9%
16W–2L · 67.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#1 Singles
25%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
8 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King