← Search

Key Sar

Annapolis, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
183 matches · 86W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Key Sar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history183 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordon Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-25 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Tacka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-03 · Sar/Herman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ross Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Wagner · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dina Caddeo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Erdely 2026 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Thomasson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Sar/Herman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Tacka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Wagner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-29 · Sar/Herman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Lavinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · Erdely 2026 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Tacka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Erdely 2026 40+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Thomasson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Sar/Herman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Newcomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
42.4%
36W–49L · 47.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–9L · 38% of games
7.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.7% of games
8.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 53% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.8% of games
8.0mixed
56.1%
23W–18L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
43 matches
#1 Singles
8%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova