← Search

Aimee Petri

ARVADA, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 156W–87L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Aimee Petri to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
L
2026-08-22 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Pivovar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mallory Karr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Toth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Angela Hale championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-02 · NJ YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amelia Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mollie Toth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · NJ YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Music
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Westfall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-14 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Nash mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-11 · NJ YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Vigil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-06-09 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Jonathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-05 · NJ TEAL · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
62.7%
32W–19L · 58.6% of games
3.0
77.3%
34W–10L · 62% of games
3.5
66.7%
54W–27L · 55.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 67.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
16W–18L · 49% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
70 matches
#1 Female Doubles
17%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
40 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal