← Search

Caren Swan

CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 146W–83L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Caren Swan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
L
2026-07-16 · GCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Herrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
Aimee Petri / Angela Hale
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Belitz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Dawn Larson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Dawn Larson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-08 · LTFC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with MaryBeth Doerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-05 · RRTC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Turner Swan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-02 · GCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Herrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · LTFC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · RRTC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Turner Swan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · GCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rima Hea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Jennifer Moeller / Sara Knudsen
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Delaney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Delaney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
75%
27W–9L · 65.7% of games
2.5
75.9%
22W–7L · 65% of games
3.0
61.4%
51W–32L · 55.5% of games
3.5
30%
9W–21L · 40.4% of games
6.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 63% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 59% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 71.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
51 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
21 matches
#1 Singles
7%
16 matches
#1 Female Singles
7%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova