← Search

Dana Heather

Niwot, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 115W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Heather to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-06 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annah Worland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · BCC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Petra McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · BCC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Petra McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Londa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · BCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalia Harms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · BCC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Petra McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Londa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · BCC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Kopp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-10 · BCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Petra McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · BCC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Petra McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · BCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsty Jahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-03 · BCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janine Londa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 70.2% of games
3.0
79.6%
39W–10L · 63.2% of games
3.5
60%
30W–20L · 52.1% of games
6.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.3% of games
7.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
15 matches
#1 Singles
9%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King