← Search

Therese Basham

CHESTERFIELD, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
252 matches · 115W–137L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Therese Basham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Basham-Simpson (F) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · Partner in Crime (Oba) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Bayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Kendall Hanks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Mindy Haas / Brittany Mohrman
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Tracey K Trembath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Herita Akamah / Andrea Mueller
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Kendall Hanks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Jennie Henry / Lindsay Chase
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Tracey K Trembath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · with Tracey K Trembath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Jenny Willis / Stephanie Miller
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · with Sherry Taylor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
Mary Fox / Carol Griffith
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Sherry Taylor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · Basham/Trembath · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Runge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Partner in Crime (Oba) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zach Schiff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-5
W
2026-07-07 · Basham/Trembath · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey K Trembath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.6% of games
4.5
44.6%
83W–103L · 48.8% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 56% of games
9.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 60.6% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
55 matches
#1 Singles
8%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer