← Search

Margreta Talen

— year-end
128 matches · 52W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Margreta Talen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-04-25 · Boyd/Eveker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Engelbrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
L
2026-04-08 · Engelbrecht (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy McGrail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-01 · Engelbrecht (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammie Voorhees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-30 · Boyd/Eveker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marty Tanner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-16 · Boyd/Eveker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Toal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-11 · Engelbrecht (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-16 · Boyd/Eveker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Toal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-28 · Engelbrecht (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-12-17 · Engelbrecht (FD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Engelbrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-10 · Engelbrecht (FD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy McGrail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 0-1
L
2025-10-22 · Engelbrecht (FD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammie Voorhees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-08 · Engelbrecht (FD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Wolf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams27 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
38.3%
41W–66L · 45.9% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer