← Search

Jeanne Schutte

Chesterfield, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 101W–85L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Jeanne Schutte to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history186 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Hardebeck-White (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Lemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · White/Hardebeck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Billie Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · White/Hardebeck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Grigg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · White/Hardebeck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Cronin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · Munoz/Malpiedi (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Klingler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angie Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · Snyder/Munoz (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Norma Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-15 · Munoz/Malpiedi (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Finnegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-14 · Snyder/Munoz (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · STL/Lemp-Pyatt/55&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angie Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-08 · Munoz/Malpiedi (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
57%
86W–65L · 52.5% of games
4.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 48.6% of games
7.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
34 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova