← Search

Squig Moore

— year-end
41 matches · 22W–19L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Squig Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-03-01 · 13 Willow Oaks Hale · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Chenault V mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-21 · 13 Willow Oaks Hale · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Chenault V mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-17 · 13 Willow Oaks Hale · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Chenault V mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
L
Alice Ulrichs / Valentina Robila
2023-10-23 · WOCC Haas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sule Sauvigne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2023-10-17 · WOCC Haas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Hager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2023-10-02 · WOCC Haas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ingrid Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Rachael Day / Cynthia Robinson
2023-07-21 · #1 Doubles · with Ingrid Hale championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Aimee Vaughn / Tiffany Jeremiah
2023-07-01 · 8 WOCC Mayer/Haas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maya Wilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-06-11 · 8 WOCC Mayer/Haas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Hager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-06-10 · 8 WOCC Mayer/Haas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-05-27 · 2 Willow Oaks Mayer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mansi Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-05-06 · 2 Willow Oaks Mayer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Hager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.4% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 41.2% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 62.3% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
4 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King