← Search

Jay Ewart

FREDERICK, MD
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 2W–17L · seasons 2022–2024

Captains: add Jay Ewart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
Michael Johnson / David Carlyle
2024-03-30 · Johnston: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Shay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Kent Christensen / Luke Llewellyn
2024-02-17 · Johnston: Genesis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-20 · Johnston: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Hulten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-12-03 · Bradfield · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Kremer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-15 · Bradfield · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Kremer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-10-01 · Bradfield · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Kremer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-04-15 · Ewart & Blume: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Purcell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-04-08 · Ewart & Blume: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Hulten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-03 · Ewart & Blume: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Shay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-01-07 · Ewart & Blume: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Gabrilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-12-17 · VerSteeg - Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Versteeg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-11-19 · VerSteeg - Genesis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Hulten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 30.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert