← Search

Dina Dulaney

West Des Moines, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 61W–51L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Dina Dulaney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-07-02 · Bangtson: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelsi Cory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Olafson & Hill-Matthes: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · Bangtson: LifeTime · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Duenow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-09 · Rickert & Bird: LifeTime · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · Gillum/Olafson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Duenow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · Morrissey & Hill-Matthes: LifeTime · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andi Laine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · Rickert & Bird: LifeTime · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · Gillum/Olafson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Hovey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · Rickert & Bird: LifeTime · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-29 · Gillum/Olafson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Holly Shortenhaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-21 · Rickert & Bird: LifeTime · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Duenow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-14 · Rickert & Bird: LifeTime · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 58.2% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63.6%
28W–16L · 59.4% of games
4.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 42% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
9W–6L · 57.4% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#1 Singles
18%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert