← Search

Tim Carstensen

— year-end
95 matches · 51W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Tim Carstensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-03-29 · Brown · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jodi Cobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · Randall: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jake Thomsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · Garner & Murphy: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Ervin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-08 · Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jodi Cobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · Garner & Murphy: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-22 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thies Kolln
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-07 · Randall: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Cosgrove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-01 · Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Trovas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · Randall: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-17 · Garner & Murphy: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Cosgrove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-11 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Wolle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-09 · Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzi Carstensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Teams41 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
56.8%
25W–19L · 52.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–11L · 30.9% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 54.3% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
15W–5L · 59% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert