← Search

Rhonda Davis

— year-end
22 matches · 13W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Rhonda Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Swisher/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Blair mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-6
W
2026-07-11 · Swisher/LHCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-0
L
2026-05-05 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Marvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
W
2026-04-30 · Richardson/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Marvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-14 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Marvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-02 · Richardson/LHCC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-24 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-19 · Richardson/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Marvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-17 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Marvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-05 · Richardson/LHCC/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Eimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-03 · Oakley/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ottofaro Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
50%
8W–8L · 55% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 74.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe