← Search

Candy Yeager

Stamford, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 66W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Candy Yeager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-07-19 · CP:On The Rise:Curtin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Zaminski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Stacey Zuk / Wendy Crocitto
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susanna Daniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Tomkiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · CP:On The Rise:Curtin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abby Meiselman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Kloster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Bea Tully / Annsley Slawsky
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deb Parnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · CP:On The Rise:Curtin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abby Meiselman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
W
2026-03-31 · Greenwich Racquet Club · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Kloster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-29 · CP:On The Rise:Curtin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maureen Fearon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-24 · Greenwich Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Kloster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-04 · CP:Net Gains 18 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cortney Ansel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · CP:Net Gains 40 Winter:das Neves/Sweet · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Kilcullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
49.2%
58W–60L · 49.5% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer