← Search

Angela Parsons

Westerville, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 71W–111L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angela Parsons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-08-13 · The Lakes G & T · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Denny
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
Kaitie Kirchner / Michelle Miller
2026-08-06 · The Lakes G & T · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Ziegler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · The Lakes G & T · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara DeLuca
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-2
L
2026-06-18 · The Lakes G & T · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Logan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · The Lakes G & T · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Donohue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joan Kilibarda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Linder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-19 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Benotti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Linder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Brod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · Olympic 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kellie Wurtzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · Olympic 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.2% of games
4.0
36.9%
48W–82L · 45.5% of games
7.5
35.5%
11W–20L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
37 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer