← Search

Deborah Davis

Selkirk, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 65W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Cary · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Quine-Laurilliard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-13 · Cary · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Regina Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · Cary · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Quine-Laurilliard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · Richter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Slosberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · Richter · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Brewbaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Richter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kripa Hongalgi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Maggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-24 · Elm Park Grinders 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Heller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-03 · Northern:Saturday Night Sets · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Vaughan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-22 · Fichera · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elly Barhydt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-20 · Elm Park Grinders 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Hao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-09 · Elm Park Grinders 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexander Kayser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
36.8%
21W–36L · 44.2% of games
4.5
0%
0W–8L · 25.4% of games
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.5% of games
8.0
19%
4W–17L · 43.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60.4%
29W–19L · 52.2% of games
9.0mixed
24.2%
8W–25L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#2 Singles
7%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King