← Search

Lizzie Barlow

— year-end
125 matches · 84W–41L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lizzie Barlow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Syracuse: Simpson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Matt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · Perry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justine Ledesma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hawthorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Perry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Gavilondo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-22 · Syracuse: Simpson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hawthorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Nardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-29 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Hack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · Get a Grip · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
13W–0L · 74% of games
3.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 73.7% of games
4.0
54.2%
26W–22L · 52.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63.1% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer