← Search

Jessica Elrod

NESBIT, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 39W–53L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jessica Elrod to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Green-NC-Southaven · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neda Nazemi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-01 · Miller40+ 6.5 combo 2026 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristi Cherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · Green-NC-Southaven · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tammy Downs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Martin Tri · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tracy Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · Miller40+ 6.5 combo 2026 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Sandifer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · Martin Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Bigham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · Parks - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Conrad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Martin Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Parks - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Parks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · Parks - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-03 · Parks - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Yelverton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-19 · Parks - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Strickland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
25%
2W–6L · 48.1% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 52.5% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 33.3% of games
6.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.8% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 45.5% of games
3.5mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#1 Singles
29%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams