← Search

Chad Alford

Batesville, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 12W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Chad Alford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Ward · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hunter Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melony Bratton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Couch - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Nunnally mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
Eva Farris / Mark Cooper
2026-06-01 · Couch - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Alford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-0
W
Donald Jones / Karen Jones
2026-05-19 · Couch - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Alford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-07 · Garner/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Downs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-29 · Garner/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregg Beeber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-23 · Garner/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alan Kirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · Garner/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregg Beeber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · Ward - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-08 · Garner/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-06 · Ward - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mckeever Heun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 38.2% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 23.4% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.7% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.9% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King