← Search

Devon Martin-Weiss

Canfield, OH
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 45W–11L · seasons 2023–2024

Captains: add Devon Martin-Weiss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2024-11-01 · C 7.5M LT Crawley · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chito Lam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-10-27 · C 8.5M LT Simon · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Adam Hosner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-10-11 · C 7.5M LT Crawley · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Quist
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-09-20 · C 7.5M LT Crawley · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chito Lam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-07-19 · X18 9.0 LT Simon · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shannon Newnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-16 · OH NEO A18 4.0M Crawley · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-07-14 · X18 8.0 LT1 Banas · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Selena Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-12 · X18 9.0 LT Simon · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shannon Newnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-07-02 · OH NEO A18 4.0M Crawley · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-07-01 · OH NEO A18 4.5M Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Sobeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-06-28 · X18 9.0 LT Simon · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Peyton Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2024-06-24 · OH NEO A18 4.5M Simon · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Sobeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
100%
7W–0L · 78% of games
4.0
100%
6W–0L · 66.1% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 51% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 61.9% of games
8.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 63% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.2% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer