← Search

Victoria Klepacz

— year-end
127 matches · 57W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Victoria Klepacz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-08-23 · QRRC-Mortsolf · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Stimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · QRRC-Mortsolf · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracey Trombetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · QRRC-Mortsolf · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Stimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · QRRC-Linhardt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Tritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-06-13 · QRRC-Linhardt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Goel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · QRRC-Mortsolf · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsay Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · QRRC-Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Sorrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
Meryl Hattenbach / Elizabeth Wood
2026-05-30 · QRRC-Linhardt · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · QRRC-Broerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Sorrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · QRRC-Broerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · QRRC-Adkinson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · QRRC-Broerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Sorrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
53.4%
47W–41L · 51.1% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 38% of games
6.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 49.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert