← Search

Wendi Baker

— year-end
106 matches · 68W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Wendi Baker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-08-23 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynn Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Jennifer Arnett / Rachel Williams
2026-08-16 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tricia Fahrenholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-12 · SRTC-Miller · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Arshia Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Meredith Goel / Kimberly Brown
2026-07-11 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-28 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Arshia Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-13 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Goins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Noreen Beiersdorfer / Elizabeth Wood
2026-05-23 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Elias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · SRTC-Fahrenholz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Elias
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · SRTC-Fahrenholz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Humphreville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-04-12 · KTC-Dailey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Starkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · SRTC-Fahrenholz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Humphreville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-08 · SRTC-Fahrenholz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Fahrenholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
77.4%
24W–7L · 63% of games
3.5
53.8%
28W–24L · 52.4% of games
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 46.4% of games
6.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe