Alicia Watkins
Midlothian, VA
328 matches · 218W–110L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Alicia Watkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history328 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Elizabeth Carr / Genevieve McGroarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
Erin Camden / Laura Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
Wendy Rose / Michelle Tenhaeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
68.2%
107W–50L · 56.3% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 45.3% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 69.1% of games
7.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 53.2% of games
8.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 65.1% of games
7.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 53.2% of games
7.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
73.9%
34W–12L · 59% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
157 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
64 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.