← Search

Sidney Mayer

— year-end
62 matches · 41W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sidney Mayer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-09-09 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Caporale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-09 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Caporale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-31 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Broughton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Hermitage Thompson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kendall Hoffler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Yablonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Caporale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-24 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlotte Caporale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · Hermitage Thompson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Wiertel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-22 · Hermitage Thompson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Wiertel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · HCC Yablonski/Lines · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Broughton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-18 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · HCC-WD-Yablonski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams30 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 54.1% of games
3.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 55.5% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 49.2% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe