← Search

Michelle Tenhaeff

Sterling, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
502 matches · 306W–196L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Tenhaeff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history502 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Laura Sagen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Afsoun Semsar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Wendy Rose championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · IL - Nix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Nix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-4
L
Lauren Johnson / Elizabeth Minicucci
2026-08-04 · IL - Nix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Dattilo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Hughes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Donadoni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · Hughes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica McAllister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-03 · IL - Nix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-0
W
2026-06-30 · IL - Nix · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JJ Herbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-19 · Hughes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Sagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Lauren Johnson / Donna Lee
2026-06-11 · IL - Nix · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Sagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-09 · Nix - Get A Grip - Ida Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deanne Iverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams99 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
65.1%
82W–44L · 57.6% of games
3.5
63.3%
171W–99L · 55% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.2% of games
6.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 57.6% of games
7.5
45%
9W–11L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
188 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
149 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
136 matches
#2 Singles
3%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
12 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer