← Search

Claire Cesta

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 27W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Claire Cesta to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-08-29 · MD.Metcalf · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Radman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · MD.Metcalf · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Radman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · MD.Davis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Winters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-21 · MD.Pavlick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Poore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · We.Hanshew40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Poore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · We.Hanshew40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-24 · MCP.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Poore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-08 · We.Hanshew40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Locklear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-20 · MCP.Hinckley · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-18 · MCP.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Pavlick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-13 · MCP.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Neto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-09 · We.Hanshew40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Messick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 46.3% of games
4.0
21.2%
7W–26L · 34.6% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 39.6% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King