← Search

Stephanie Pavlick

Cary, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
185 matches · 98W–87L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Pavlick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
W
2026-09-14 · MD.Wade · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · MD.Wade · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Cerami-Haidri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
Tamie Nash / Denise Wilson
2026-08-28 · TOC.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Poore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · TOC.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Poore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · TOC.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erika Clausson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · MD.Pavlick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Poore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · MD.Wade · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Klingemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · TOC.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · TOC.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · MD.Pavlick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Poore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · TOC.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-4
W
2026-07-10 · TOC.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Merchant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.8% of games
2.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.9% of games
3.0
60%
33W–22L · 52.4% of games
3.5
45.8%
27W–32L · 45.8% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 46.9% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.2% of games
6.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 48% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#2 Singles
8%
15 matches
#3 Singles
8%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert