← Search

Michelle Hoyles

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 127W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Hoyles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history255 matches
L
2026-09-08 · LOCH.Hoyles · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Capetanos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-01 · LOCH.Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thaiza Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Debbie Powell / Beth Johnson
2026-08-25 · LOCH.Hoyles · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with DeLana Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · LOCH.Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christie Benjamin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · LOCH.Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Hornada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Hornada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · LOCH.Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
Jennifer Johnson / Sara Hyde
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hanshew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · LOCH.Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-13 · LOCH.Pelt · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gresko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · We.Hanshew40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
71.8%
28W–11L · 63% of games
3.5
41.1%
60W–86L · 48% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
52.5%
21W–19L · 48.9% of games
7.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.9% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
63 matches
#1 Singles
21%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
36 matches
#2 Singles
10%
26 matches
#3 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer