← Search

Liz Hassay

— year-end
171 matches · 81W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Liz Hassay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-05-08 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary McGuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yoshie Narui
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-04-19 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
L
Abigail Shoemaker / Gina Voitov
2026-03-15 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Saale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-13 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Michelle Miller / Amanda Spires
2026-03-01 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Saale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Cynthia Pawlarczyk / Olivia Evans
2026-02-27 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-01 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pei-An Chao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-30 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary McGuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
W
2025-12-05 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
L
2025-11-14 · Racquet Club 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Bradbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
71.7%
33W–13L · 56.1% of games
3.5
38.9%
42W–66L · 47.1% of games
6.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 47.3% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams